L’analyse de la communication non verbale: Les dangers de la pseudoscience en contextes de sécurité et de justice
Authors
Vincent Denault
Pierrich Plusquellec
Louise M. Jupe
Michel St-Yves
Norah E. Dunbar
Maria Hartwig
Siegfried L. Sporer
Jessica Rioux-Turcotte
Jonathan Jarry
Dave Walsh
Henry Otgaar
Andrei Viziteu
Victoria Talwar
David A. Keatley
Iris Blandón-Gitlin
Clint Townson
Nadine Deslauriers-Varin
Scott O. Lilienfeld
Miles L. Patterson
Igor Areh
Alfred Allan, Edith Cowan UniversityFollow
Hilary Evans Cameron
Rémi Boivin
Leanne Ten Brinke
Jaume Masip
Ray Bull
Mireille Cyr
Lorraine Hope
Leif A. Strömwall
Stephanie J. Bennett
Faisal Al Menaiya
Richard A. Leo
Annelies Vredeveldt
Marty Laforest
Charles R. Honts
Antonio L. Manzanero
Samantha Mann
Pär Anders Granhag
Karl Ask
Fiona Gabbert
Jean Pierre Guay
Alexandre Coutant
Jeffrey Hancock
Valerie Manusov
Judee K. Burgoon
Steven M. Kleinman
Gordon Wright
Sara Landström
Ian Freckelton
Zarah Vernham
Peter J. van Koppen
Document Type
Journal Article
Publication Title
Revue Internationale de Criminologie et de Police Technique et Scientifique
ISSN
14244683
Volume
73
Issue
1
First Page
15
Last Page
44
Publisher
Polymedia SA
School
School of Arts and Humanities
RAS ID
45104
Abstract
© 2020, Polymedia Meichtry SA. All rights reserved. For security and justice professionals, the thousands of peer-reviewed articles on nonverbal communication represent important sources of knowledge. However, despite the scope of the scientific work carried out on this subject, professionals can turn to programs, methods and approaches that fail to reflect the state of science. The objective of this article is to examine (i) concepts of nonverbal communication conveyed by these programs, methods and approaches, but also (ii) the consequences of their use. To achieve this objective, we describe the scope of scientific research on nonverbal communication. A program (SPOT; “Screening of Passengers by Observation Techniques”), a method (the BAI; “Behavior Analysis Interview”) and an approach (synergology) that each run counter to the state of science are examined. Finally, we outline five hypotheses to explain why some organizations in the fields of security and justice are turning to pseudoscience and pseudoscientific techniques.
Access Rights
subscription content
Comments
Denault, V., Plusquellec, P., Jupe, L. M., St-Yves, M., Dunbar, N. E., Hartwig, M., ... van Koppen, P. J. (2020). L’analyse de la communication non verbale: Les dangers de la pseudoscience en contextes de sécurité et de justice. Revue Internationale de Criminologie et de Police Technique et Scientifique, 73(1), 15-44.
Please note: This item is in the French language