Laboratory-based surveillance of clostridium difficile infection in Australian health care and community settings, 2013 to 2018
Authors
Stacey Hong
Papanin Putsathit, Edith Cowan UniversityFollow
Narelle George
Christine Hemphill
Peter G. Huntington
Tony M. Korman
Despina Kotsanas
Monica Lahra
Rodney McDougall
Casey V. Moore
Graeme R. Nimmo
Louise Prendergast
Jennifer Robson
Lynette Waring
Michael C. Wehrhahn
Gerhard F. Weldhagen
Richard M. Wilson
Thomas V. Riley, Edith Cowan UniversityFollow
Daniel R. Knight
Document Type
Journal Article
Publication Title
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
Volume
58
Issue
11
Publisher
American Society for Microbiology
School
School of Medical and Health Sciences
RAS ID
32156
Funders
Raine Medical Research Foundation / National Health and Medical Research Council
Grant Number
NHMRC Number : APP1138257
Abstract
Copyright © 2020 American Society for Microbiology. In the early 2000s, a binary toxin (CDT)-producing strain of Clostridium difficile, ribotype 027 (RT027), caused extensive outbreaks of diarrheal disease in North America and Europe. This strain has not become established in Australia, and there is a markedly different repertoire of circulating strains there compared to other regions of the world. The C. difficile Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance (CDARS) study is a nationwide longitudinal surveillance study of C. difficile infection (CDI) in Australia. Here, we describe the molecular epidemiology of CDI in Australian health care and community settings over the first 5 years of the study, 2013 to 2018. Between 2013 and 2018, 10 diagnostic microbiology laboratories from five states in Australia participated in the CDARS study. From each of five states, one private (representing community) and one public (representing hospitals) laboratory submitted isolates of C. difficile or PCR-positive stool samples during two collection periods per year, February-March (summer/autumn) and August-September (winter/spring). C. difficile was characterized by toxin gene profiling and ribotyping. A total of 1,523 isolates of C. difficile were studied. PCR ribotyping yielded 203 different RTs, the most prevalent being RT014/020 (n = 449; 29.5%). The epidemic CDT+ RT027 (n = 2) and RT078 (n = 6), and the recently described RT251 (n = 10) and RT244 (n = 6) were not common, while RT126 (n = 17) was the most prevalent CDT+ type. A heterogeneous C. difficile population was identified. C. difficile RT014/020 was the most prevalent type found in humans with CDI. Continued surveillance of CDI in Australia remains critical for the detection of emerging strain lineages.
DOI
10.1128/JCM.01552-20
Access Rights
subscription content
Comments
Hong, S., Putsathit, P., George, N., Hemphill, C., Huntington, P. G., Korman, T. M., ... Knight, D. R. (2020). Laboratory-based surveillance of Clostridium difficile infection in Australian health care and community settings, 2013 to 2018. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 58(11), article e01552-20. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.01552-20