An increased neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio in Alzheimer's disease is a function of age and is weakly correlated with neocortical amyloid accumulation

Document Type

Journal Article

Publisher

Elsevier

Faculty

Faculty of Health, Engineering and Science

School

School of Medical Sciences / Centre of Excellence for Alzheimer's Disease Research and Care

RAS ID

18806

Comments

Rembach, A., Watt, A., Wilson, W., Rainey-Smith, S. R., Ellis, K., Rowe, C., Villemagne, V., Macaulay, S., Bush, A., Martins, R. N., Ames, D., Masters, C., Doecke, J., & AIBL Research Group, T. (2014). An increased neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio in Alzheimer's disease is a function of age and is weakly correlated with neocortical amyloid accumulation. Journal of Neuroimmunology, 273(1-2), 65-71. Available here

Abstract

Inflammation is a hallmark of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Whether directly involved in the pathogenesis, or a downstream consequence of neuronal death, the blood neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is reported to be a putative, non-invasive peripheral biomarker for AD. The aim of this study was to re-evaluate the diagnostic utility of longitudinal measures of the NLR. The NLR was stable across all time-points and weakly correlated with neocortical amyloid burden (R = 0.21 at baseline, 0.27 at 18 months, 0.20 at 36 months and 0.10 at 54 months). Cross-sectionally, the NLR was significantly elevated in AD participants as compared to HC participants at baseline (p < 0.0001), 18 months (p < 0.0001), 36 months (p = 0.002) and at 54 months (p = 0.007), however only prior to adjustment for age, sex and APOEε4 allele status (p > 0.05 at all time-points except for 18 months; p < 0.0001). Longitudinally, the NLR was not significantly different between HC and AD participants (p > 0.05) adjusted for age, sex and APOEε4 allele status. Comparing the NLR between cognitive transition groups over time (transition towards an AD type dementia), there was no significant difference in the NLR levels between those participants, who did not transition and those participants who did transition, or those in the stable AD group after adjusting for age, sex and APOEε4 allele status (p > 0.05). Despite inflammation being a hallmark in AD and previous reports showing that the NLR can discriminate HC from AD patients, our results suggest that the sensitivity of the NLR itself is not robust enough for diagnostic utility. We identified significant relationships cross sectionally (p < 0.05 at baseline, 18 months and 36 months) between the NLR and neocortical amyloid burden, but this relationship was lost after longitudinal analyses (p > 0.5). The NLR also had limited association with cognitive decline, although in our cohort, the number of participants transitioning was relatively small. In conclusion, the NLR may reflect AD-related inflammatory processes in the periphery, but age and sex are dominant covariates which need to be controlled for in population-based screening.

DOI

10.1016/j.jneuroim.2014.05.005

Access Rights

subscription content

Link to Full Text

Share

 
COinS