Author Identifier
Stephanie Meek
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7825-4495
Violetta Wilk
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0020-2599
Claire Lambert
Document Type
Journal Article
Publication Title
Journal of Business Research
Volume
125
First Page
354
Last Page
367
Publisher
Elsevier
School
School of Business and Law
RAS ID
32494
Funders
Edith Cowan University - Open Access Support Scheme 2020
Abstract
© 2020 Edith Cowan University With the proliferation of user generated online reviews, uncovering helpful restaurant reviews is increasingly challenging for potential consumers. Heuristics (such as “Likes”) not only facilitate this process but also enhance the social impact of a review on an Online Opinion Platform. Based on Dual Process Theory and Social Impact Theory, this study explores which contextual and descriptive attributes of restaurant reviews influence the reviewee to accept a review as helpful and thus, “Like” the review. Utilising both qualitative and quantitative methodologies, a big data sample of 58,468 restaurant reviews on Zomato were analysed. Results revealed the informational factor of positive recommendation framing and the normative factors of strong argument quality and moderate recommendation ratings, influence the generation of a reviewee “Like”. This study highlights the important filtering function a heuristic can offer prospective customers which can also result in greater social impact for the Online Opinion Platform.
DOI
10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.12.001
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License.
Included in
Communication Technology and New Media Commons, Hospitality Administration and Management Commons, Social Media Commons
Comments
Meek, S., Wilk, V., & Lambert, C. (2021). A big data exploration of the informational and normative influences on the helpfulness of online restaurant reviews. Journal of Business Research, 125, 354-367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.12.001