A decision-making model for pre-sentence evaluations for juveniles

Abstract

© 2020, © 2020 The Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law. Forensic mental health assessments (FMHAs) are requested by the courts to assist in the sentencing process and can have a major impact upon the life of the person evaluated. Completing these assessments is a core competency for forensic psychologists. However, some FMHAs are undertaken by psychologists who have no forensic training. Despite this, there are no formalised Australian minimum standards to ensure reports are helpful to the courts and reflect sound evaluation methodologies. Drawing upon a critical review of the literature and recent research findings, we propose a 10-step decision-making model for pre-sentence evaluations of juveniles. Our model provides a framework for decision-making and highlights the key elements of an evaluation. The model provides a basis for developing practice guidelines and professional standards. The next step is to test the model in the field to determine its impact on the quality of psychological pre-sentence reports.

RAS ID

34135

Document Type

Journal Article

Date of Publication

2021

ISSN

13218719

School

School of Arts and Humanities

Copyright

subscription content

Publisher

Taylor and Francis

Identifier

Deirdre Drake

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7566-9209

Comments

Bycroft, D., Dear, G. E., & Drake, D. (2021). A decision-making model for pre-sentence evaluations for juveniles. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 28(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2020.1751332

Share

 
COinS
 

Link to publisher version (DOI)

10.1080/13218719.2020.1751332