Document Type
Journal Article
Publication Title
Sports Medicine
Volume
51
Issue
1
First Page
11
Last Page
20
PubMed ID
33175329
Publisher
Springer
School
School of Medical and Health Sciences
RAS ID
35663
Funders
Università degli Studi di Sassari
Abstract
© 2020, The Author(s). Background: Cross-education refers to increased motor output (i.e., force generation, skill) of the opposite, untrained limb following a period of unilateral exercise training. Despite extensive research, several aspects of the transfer phenomenon remain controversial. Methods: A modified two-round Delphi online survey was conducted among international experts to reach consensus on terminology, methodology, mechanisms of action, and translational potential of cross-education, and to provide a framework for future research. Results: Through purposive sampling of the literature, we identified 56 noted experts in the field, of whom 32 completed the survey, and reached consensus (75% threshold) on 17 out of 27 items. Conclusion: Our consensus-based recommendations for future studies are that (1) the term ‘cross-education’ should be adopted to refer to the transfer phenomenon, also specifying if transfer of strength or skill is meant; (2) functional magnetic resonance imaging, short-interval intracortical inhibition and interhemispheric inhibition appear to be promising tools to study the mechanisms of transfer; (3) strategies which maximize cross-education, such as high-intensity training, eccentric contractions, and mirror illusion, seem worth being included in the intervention plan; (4) study protocols should be designed to include at least 13–18 sessions or 4–6 weeks to produce functionally meaningful transfer of strength, and (5) cross-education could be considered as an adjuvant treatment particularly for unilateral orthopedic conditions and sports injuries. Additionally, a clear gap in views emerged between the research field and the purely clinical field. The present consensus statement clarifies relevant aspects of cross-education including neurophysiological, neuroanatomical, and methodological characteristics of the transfer phenomenon, and provides guidance on how to improve the quality and usability of future cross-education studies.
DOI
10.1007/s40279-020-01377-7
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Included in
Exercise Science Commons, Sports Sciences Commons, Translational Medical Research Commons
Comments
Manca, A., Hortobágyi, T., Carroll, T. J., Enoka, R. M., Farthing, J. P., Gandevia, S. C., ... Deriu, F. (2021). Contralateral effects of unilateral strength and skill training: Modified Delphi consensus to establish key aspects of cross-education. Sports Medicine, 51(1), 11-20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-020-01377-7