Facilitators and barriers to general practitioner and general practice nurse participation in end-of-life care: Systematic review

Author Identifier

Leanne Monterosso

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6545-9619

Document Type

Journal Article

Publication Title

BMJ Supportive and Palliative Care

Volume

14

Issue

1

Publisher

BMJ Publishing Group

School

School of Nursing and Midwifery

RAS ID

34183

Funders

Royal Australian College of General Practitioner/HCF grant in 2013

Comments

Rhee, J. J., Grant, M., Senior, H., Monterosso, L., McVey, P., Johnson, C., ... Mitchell, G. (2024). Facilitators and barriers to general practitioner and general practice nurse participation in end-of-life care: Systematic review. BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care, 14(1),e12-c22. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjspcare-2019-002109

Abstract

Background:

General practitioners (GPS) and general practice nurses (GPNs) face increasing demands to provide palliative care (PC) or end-of-life care (EoLC) as the population ages. To enhance primary EoLC, the facilitators and barriers to their provision need to be understood.

Objective:

To provide a comprehensive description of the facilitators and barriers to GP and GPN provision of PC or EoLC.

Method:

Systematic literature review. Data included papers (2000 to 2017) sought from Medline, PsycInfo, Embase, Joanna Briggs Institute and Cochrane databases.

Results:

From 6209 journal articles, 62 reviewed papers reported the GP's and GPN's role in EoLC or PC practice. Six themes emerged: Patient factors; personal GP factors; general practice factors; relational factors; co-ordination of care; availability of services. Four specific settings were identified: Aged care facilities, out-of-hours care and resource-constrained settings (rural, and low-income and middle-income countries). Most GPS provide EoLC to some extent, with greater professional experience leading to increased comfort in performing this form of care. The organisation of primary care at practice, local and national level impose numerous structural barriers that impede more significant involvement. There are potential gaps in service provision where GPNs may provide significant input, but there is a paucity of studies describing GPN routine involvement in EoLC.

Conclusions:

While primary care practitioners have a natural role to play in EoLC, significant barriers exist to improved GP and GPN involvement in PC. More work is required on the role of GPNs.

DOI

10.1136/bmjspcare-2019-002109

Access Rights

subscription content

Link to Full Text

Share

 
COinS