Authors
Penelope Schofield
Karla Gough
Amelia Hyatt
Alan White
Mark Frydenberg
Suzanne Chambers, Edith Cowan UniversityFollow
Louisa G. Gordon
Robert Gardiner, Edith Cowan UniversityFollow
Declan G. Murphy
Lawrence Cavdon
Natalie Richards
Barbara Murphy
Stephen Quinn
Ilona Juraskova
Document Type
Journal Article
Publication Title
Trials
Volume
22
Issue
49
PubMed ID
33430950
Publisher
BMC / Springer Nature
School
Exercise Medicine Research Institute
RAS ID
39599
Funders
National Health and Medical Research Council
Abstract
© 2021, The Author(s). Background: Active surveillance (AS) is the disease management option of choice for low-risk prostate cancer. Despite this, men with low-risk prostate cancer (LRPC) find management decisions distressing and confusing. We developed Navigate, an online decision aid to help men and their partners make management decisions consistent with their values. The aims are to evaluate the impact of Navigate on uptake of AS; decision-making preparedness; decisional conflict, regret and satisfaction; quality of illness communication; and prostate cancer-specific quality of life and anxiety. In addition, the healthcare cost impact, cost-effectiveness and patterns of use of Navigate will be assessed. This paper describes the study protocol. Methods: Three hundred four men and their partners are randomly assigned one-to-one to Navigate or to the control arm. Randomisation is electronically generated and stratified by site. Navigate is an online decision aid that presents up-to-date, unbiased information on LRPC tailored to Australian men and their partners including each management option and potential side-effects, and an interactive values clarification exercise. Participants in the control arm will be directed to the website of Australia’s peak national body for prostate cancer. Eligible patients will be men within 3 months of being diagnosed with LRPC, aged 18 years or older, and who are yet to make a treatment decision, who are deemed eligible for AS by their treating clinician and who have Internet access and sufficient English to participate. The primary outcome is self-reported uptake of AS as the first-line management option. Secondary outcomes include self-reported preparedness for decision-making; decisional conflict, regret and satisfaction; quality of illness communication; and prostate cancer-specific quality of life. Uptake of AS 1 month after consent will be determined through patient self-report. Men and their partners will complete study outcome measures before randomisation and 1, 3 and 6 months after study consent. Discussion: The Navigate online decision aid has the potential to increase the choice of AS in LRPC, avoiding or delaying unnecessary radical treatments and associated side effects. In addition, Navigate is likely to reduce patients’ and partners’ confusion and distress in management decision-making and increase their quality of life. Trial registration: Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry ACTRN12616001665426. Registered on 2 December 2016. All items from the WHO Trial Registration Data set can be found in this manuscript.
DOI
10.1186/s13063-020-04986-9
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Comments
Schofield, P., Gough, K., Hyatt, A., White, A., Frydenberg, M., Chambers, S., ... Juraskova, I. (2021). Navigate: A study protocol for a randomised controlled trial of an online treatment decision aid for men with low-risk prostate cancer and their partners. Trials, 22, article 49. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-020-04986-9