Author Identifier
Manshu Song: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1433-7192
Wei Wang: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1430-1360
Document Type
Journal Article
Publication Title
BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine
PubMed ID
39304213
Publisher
BMJ Publishing Group
School
Centre for Precision Health / School of Medical and Health Sciences
RAS ID
72545
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (82073659) / Funding for Guangdong Medical Leading Talent / First Affiliated Hospital / Shantou University Medical College, China / Grant for Key Disciplinary Project of Clinical Medicine under the High-level University Development Program, Guangdong / Western Australian Future Health Research and Innovation Fund (WANMA/Ideas2023-24/10) / Guangdong Graduate Education Innovation Plan Project (2021SFKC039) / ECU-SUMC collaborative PhD project
Abstract
Diagnostic tests are frequently applied within clinical practice to assist with disease diagnosis, differential diagnosis, disease grading and prognosis evaluation. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis is one common approach for analysing discriminative performance of a diagnostic test, where it can determine the optimal cut-off value with the best diagnostic performance.1 However, as a majority of clinicians are non-statisticians, several errors have been observed in clinical research when applying ROC curves. These errors may be misleading in the selection of diagnostic tests and disease diagnosis, thus adding to patient burden. To address these errors, clinicians do not need a deep understanding of the intricate mathematical formulas of ROC analysis, but should develop basic knowledge and skills to prevent or avoid commonly overlooked mistakes. This article aims to guide clinicians to avoid common pitfalls in ROC analysis.
DOI
10.1136/bmjebm-2024-113078
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Comments
He, Z., Zhang, Q., Song, M., Tan, X., & Wang, W. (2025). Four overlooked errors in ROC analysis: how to prevent and avoid. BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine, 30(3), 208-211. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjebm-2024-113078