Author Identifier

Silvano Zanuso: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8187-5815

Document Type

Journal Article

Publication Title

Bioengineering

Volume

12

Issue

3

Publisher

MDPI

School

School of Medical and Health Sciences

Publication Unique Identifier

10.3390/bioengineering12030292

Comments

Zoffoli, L., Zanuso, S., & Biscarini, A. (2025). Effects on force, velocity, power, and muscle activation of resistances with variable inertia generated by programmable electromechanical motors during explosive chest press exercises. Bioengineering, 12(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering12030292

Abstract

Strength training machines incorporating advanced electro-mechanical technologies can produce hybrid resistances with variable inertia, such as a resistance that progressively changes from gravitational (inertial) to pneumatic (non-inertial) across the range of motion (ROM). To explore the biomechanical effects of these innovative resistances, a robotic chest press machine was programmed to offer three distinct inertial profiles: gravitational-type constant inertia throughout the ROM (IFULL); no inertia (IZERO); and linearly descending inertia across the ROM (IVAR). Ten healthy adults performed five maximal-effort, explosive chest press movements under each inertial profile at 30, 50 and 70% of their one-repetition maximum. During each trial, muscle activity of the pectoralis major, anterior deltoid, and triceps brachii was recorded, along with force, velocity and power outputs from the machine. Statistical non-parametric maps based on two-way repeated measures ANOVA were used to assess the effects of load level and inertial profile on the collected time series. Higher load levels consistently led to increased force and reduced velocity and power outcomes over large parts of the ROM. Compared to IFULL, IZERO allowed for greater velocity at the expense of lower force throughout the ROM, while IVAR produced higher force and power outputs despite having lower velocity than IZERO. Additionally, both IZERO and IVAR significantly increased triceps brachii activity at the end of the ROM compared to IFULL. IVAR outperformed both IFULL and IZERO in terms of force and power. Coaches and therapists are advised to consider variable inertial profiles as a key parameter when designing exercise programs for athletes or patients.

DOI

10.3390/bioengineering12030292

Creative Commons License

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Share

 
COinS